Urbanie & Urbanus

Cross-Border Living in Hong Kong and Shenzhen: Insights into the Residential Environment Preferences of Young Professionals

Jingbo Ma

Master of Science in Urban Design, The Chinese University of Hong Kong

and  Sylvia Man Ha Chan

Adjunct Associate Professor, The Chinese University of Hong Kong

and  Jeroen van Ameijde

Assistant Professor and Director of the MSc in Urban Design programme at the School of Architecture, The Chinese University of Hong Kong

References

  1. Anselin, A., Meire, P. M., & Anselin, L. (1989). Multicriteria techniques in ecological evaluation: an example using the analytical hierarchy process. Biological Conservation, 49(3), 215-229.

  2. Barinova, V., Rochhia, S., & Zemtsov, S. (2022). Attracting highly skilled migrants to the Russian regions. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 14(1), 147-173.

  3. Barter, P. A. (2006). Multiple dimensions in negotiating the cross-border transport links that connect and divide Singapore and Johor, Malaysia. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 47(2), 287-303.

  4. Billari, F. C., & Liefbroer, A. C. (2010). Towards a new pattern of transition to adulthood?. Advances in life course research, 15(2-3), 59-75.

  5. Broersma, L., Edzes, A., & Van Dijk, J. (2022). Commuting between border regions in The Netherlands, Germany and Belgium: an explanatory model. Journal of borderlands studies, 37(3), 551-573.

  6. Castro Campos, B., Yiu, C. Y., Shen, J., Liao, K. H., & Maing, M. (2016). The anticipated housing pathways to homeownership of young people in Hong Kong. International Journal of Housing Policy, 16(2), 223-242.

  7. Chan, A. K. W., Chiu, M. M., Yang, S., & Ngan, L. L. S. (2020). Mobility, belongingness and schooling experiences of Chinese cross-border students. Children and Youth Services Review, 111, 104870. 

  8. Chan, A. K. W., Ngan, L. L. S., Wong, A. K., & Chan, W. S. (2017). ‘Border’ matters in discussions of cross-border students. Social Transformations in Chinese Societies, 13(1), 56-70. 

  9. Chandra, A., Head, K., & Tappata, M. (2014). The economics of cross-border travel. Review of Economics and Statistics, 96(4), 648-661.

  10. Chang, T. C. (2004). Tourism in a ‘borderless’ world: the Singapore experience.

  11. Chatterjee, K., Chng, S., Clark, B., Davis, A., De Vos, J., Ettema, D., ... & Reardon, L. (2020). Commuting and wellbeing: a critical overview of the literature with implications for policy and future research. Transport reviews, 40(1), 5-34.

  12. Chatterjee, P., Nagi, N., Agarwal, A., Das, B., Banerjee, S., Sarkar, S., ... & Gangakhedkar, R. R. (2020). The 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic: A review of the current evidence. Indian Journal of Medical Research, 151(2-3), 147-159.

  13. Chen, D., He, Z., Hong, X., Ni, X., & Ma, R. (2022). Green and Low-Carbon Commuting Evaluation and Optimization of a Cross-Border Metropolitan Region by the Subway Network: The Case of Shenzhen and Hong Kong, China. Land, 11(8), 1127.

  14. Decoville, A., Durand, F., Sohn, C., & Walther, O. (2013). Comparing cross-border metropolitan integration in Europe: Towards a functional typology. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 28(2), 221-237.

  15. Dehghani-sanij, A. R., Soltani, M., & Raahemifar, K. (2015). A new design of wind tower for passive ventilation in buildings to reduce energy consumption in windy regions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 42, 182-195.

  16. Edzes, A. J., van Dijk, J., & Broersma, L. (2022). Does cross-border commuting between EU-countries reduce inequality?. Applied Geography, 139, 102639.

  17. Gong, Y., & MacLachlan, I. (2021). Housing allocation with Chinese characteristics: The case of talent workers in Shenzhen and Guangzhou. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 62(4), 428-453.

  18. Häggman-Laitila, A., Salokekkilä, P., & Karki, S. (2019, October). Young people’s preparedness for adult life and coping after foster care: A systematic review of perceptions and experiences in the transition period. In Child & Youth Care Forum (Vol. 48, pp. 633-661). Springer US.

  19. Hampton, M. P. (2009). The socio-economic impacts of Singaporean cross-border tourism in Malaysia and Indonesia.

  20. Hampton, M. P. (2010). Enclaves and ethnic ties: The local impacts of Singaporean cross-border tourism in Malaysia and Indonesia. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 31(2), 239-253.

  21. He, S., Niu, C., Wei, Y., Cai, Y., Zhang, W., Xiao, Y., & Yin, J. (2023). COVID-19 impacts on cross-border mobility of senior population between Shenzhen and Hong Kong. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 1285288.

  22. HKSAR Government (2011). 2011-12 Policy Address. 2011-12Policy Address (2011-12施政報告).

  23. HKSAR Government (2023). Northern Metropolis Action Agenda 2023. Northern Metropolis. https://www.nm.gov.hk/downloads/NM_Chi_Booklet_Web.pdf

  24. Huang, Z., Du, X., & Yu, X. (2015). Home ownership and residential satisfaction: Evidence from Hangzhou, China. Habitat International, 49, 74-83.

  25. Hutchinson, F. E. (2021). In the gateway’s shadow: Interactions between Singapore’s Hinterlands. Growth and Change, 52(1), 71-87.

  26. Jabareen, Y. (2005). Culture and housing preferences in a developing city. Environment and behavior, 37(1), 134-146.

  27. Jacob, N., Munford, L., Rice, N., & Roberts, J. (2019). The disutility of commuting? The effect of gender and local labor markets. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 77, 264-275.

  28. Jin, C., Li, B., Jansen, S. J., Boumeester, H. J., & Boelhouwer, P. J. (2023). Understanding the housing pathways and migration plans of young professionals in metropolises–A case study of Shenzhen. Housing, Theory and Society, 40(4), 435-462.

  29. Kain, J. F., & Quigley, J. M. (1970). Measuring the value of housing quality. Journal of the American statistical association, 65(330), 532-548.

  30. Kauko, T. (2006). Expressions of housing consumer preferences: Proposition for a research agenda. Housing, Theory and Society, 23(2), 92-108.

  31. Kim, M. (2020). Exploring housing preference of young adults–With focus on largest cities in Sweden.

  32. Kleeman, A., Giles-Corti, B., Gunn, L., Hooper, P., & Foster, S. (2022). Exploring the design, quality and use of communal areas in apartment developments. Cities & health, 6(3), 480-494.

  33. Kulawczuk, P., Poszewiecki, A., & Szczęch, A. (2019). The needs of youth and spatial justice. How the inclusion of youth preferences can support targeted regional policies. Europa Xxi, 37, 71-88.

  34. Lam. C. Y. (2023, August 26). Lam Chi Yin: On Population Projections - What are the Government’s Plans after the ‘Auspicious Omen’? (林緻茵:論人口推算——迎來「吉祥之兆」後政府有什麼計劃?). Mingpao. https://news.mingpao.com/pns/%e8%a7%80%e9%bb%9e/article/20230822/s00012/1692635495197/%e6%9e%97%e7%b7%bb%e8%8c%b5-%e8%ab%96%e4%ba%ba%e5%8f%a3%e6%8e%a8%e7%ae%97-%e8%bf%8e%e4%be%86%e3%80%8c%e5%90%89%e7%a5%a5%e4%b9%8b%e5%85%86%e3%80%8d%e5%be%8c-%e6%94%bf%e5%ba%9c%e6%9c%89%e4%bb%80%e9%ba%bc%e8%a8%88%e5%8a%83

  35. Lanoye, A., Brown, K. L., & LaRose, J. G. (2017). The transition into young adulthood: a critical period for weight control. Current diabetes reports, 17, 1-14.

  36. Lenz, B. (2001). The transition from adolescence to young adulthood: a theoretical perspective. The Journal of School Nursing, 17(6), 300-306.

  37. Leung, M. W., & Waters, J. L. (2022). Making ways for ‘better education’: Placing the Shenzhen-Hong Kong mobility industry. Urban Studies, 59(11), 2313-2332.

  38. Li, B., Jin, C., Jansen, S. J., van der Heijden, H., & Boelhouwer, P. (2021). Residential satisfaction of private tenants in China’s superstar cities: The case of Shenzhen, China. Cities, 118, 103355.

  39. Lin, X., Ren, T., Wu, H., & Xiao, Y. (2021). Housing price, professional movement, and innovation output: Evidence from Chinese cities. Review of Development Economics, 25(1), 76-103.

  40. Lu. E. (2021, January 8). Cross-boundary commute - a long hard stretch. China Daily. https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202101/08/WS5ffcfaf6a31024ad0baa1eb6_1.html

  41. Lu, Q., & Burgess, G. (2023). Housing for professionals: Highly skilled migrants’ strategies for accessing affordable rental housing. Transactions in Planning and Urban Research, 2(4), 478-501.

  42. Milakis, D., & Van Wee, B. (2018). “For me it is always like half an hour”: Exploring the acceptable travel time concept in the US and European contexts. Transport Policy, 64, 113-122.

  43. Mouratidis, K. (2020). Commute satisfaction, neighborhood satisfaction, and housing satisfaction as predictors of subjective well-being and indicators of urban livability. Travel Behaviour and Society, 21, 265-278.

  44. Mouratidis, K., Ettema, D., & Næss, P. (2019). Urban form, travel behavior, and travel satisfaction. Transportation research part A: policy and practice, 129, 306-320.

  45. Murphy, E., & King, E. A. (2016). Testing the accuracy of smartphones and sound level meter applications for measuring environmental noise. Applied Acoustics, 106, 16-22.

  46. Nedhal, A. T., Syed, F. S. F., & Adel, A. (2016). Relationship between window-to-floor area ratio and single-point daylight factor in varied residential rooms in Malaysia. Indian journal of science and technology, 9(33), 1-8.

  47. Ng, E., Yuan, C., Chen, L., Ren, C., & Fung, J. C. (2011). Improving the wind environment in high-density cities by understanding urban morphology and surface roughness: A study in Hong Kong. Landscape and Urban planning, 101(1), 59-74.

  48. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013). Regions and innovation: Collaborating across borders. OECD Publishing.

  49. Páez, A., & Whalen, K. (2010). Enjoyment of commute: A comparison of different transportation modes. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 44(7), 537-549.

  50. Putri, H. M., & Salim, W. (2019, October). Outer Island Development in Crossborder Cooperation Framework: Cooperation or Exploitation? (Study Case: Natuna Island in Singapore–Johor-Riau Cooperation). In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 328, No. 1, p. 012040). IOP Publishing.

  51. Rameshkkumar, S. R., Gope, P., Santhosh, R., Murlidhar, N., Gawande, M. M., & Umamaheswari, S. (2024). Exploring the Severity of Factors Influencing Lifestyle on Housing Preference of Young Adults: A Thematic Analysis. Migration Letters, 21(S1), 1013-1023.

  52. Redmond, L. S., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (2001). The positive utility of the commute: modeling ideal commute time and relative desired commute amount. Transportation, 28, 179-205. 

  53. Rugg, J. J., & Quilgars, D. J. (2015). Young people and housing: A review of the present policy and practice landscape. Youth and Policy, 5-16.

  54. Saad, S., & Bahadori, R. (2018). Sustainability evaluation of last mile food delivery: Pickup point using lockers versus home delivery. In International Food Operations and Processing Simulation Workshop, FoodOPS 2018 (pp. 37-42). CAL-TEK Srl.

  55. Saaty, T. L. (1975). Sudan transport study: The use of hierarchies in the design of transport systems.

  56. Saaty, T. L., & Bennett, J. P. (1977). A theory of analytical hierarchies applied to political candidacy. Behavioral Science, 22(4), 237-245.

  57. Saaty, T. L. (1982). The analytic hierarchy process: A new approach to deal with fuzziness in architecture. Architectural Science Review, 25(3), 64-69.

  58. Saaty, R. W. (1987). The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used. Mathematical modelling, 9(3-5), 161-176.

  59. Shenzhen Statistical Bureau & NBS Survey Office in Shenzhen (2020). Shenzhen Statistical Yearbook, 2020. China Statistics Press. 
  60.  
    Shenzhen Statistical Bureau (2021). Communiqué of the Seventh National Population Census of Shenzhen (No. 6). tjj.sz.gov.cn. https://tjj.sz.gov.cn/ztzl/zt/szsdqcqgrkpc/szrp/content/post_8772123.html

  61. Shildrick, T. A., MacDonald, R., Webster, C., & Garthwaite, K. (2012). Poverty and insecurity: life in low-pay, no-pay Britain. Bristol: Policy Press.

  62. Song, Y., & Hu, Y. (2009). Group decision-making method in the field of coal mine safety management based on AHP with clustering. In Proceedings of the 6th International ISCRAM Conference–Gothenburg, Sweden.

  63. Soon, A., & Tan, C. (2019). An analysis on housing affordability in Malaysian housing markets and the home buyers’ preference. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 13(3), 375-392.

  64. Switalla, J. (2024). Housing choices and preferences of seniors and pre-seniors in Bottrop, Germany. A conjoint anaylsis (Doctoral dissertation).

  65. Tan T.H. (2009) Home owning motivation in Malaysia. Journal of Accounting, Business and Management 16 (1), 93 – 112.

  66. The Census and Statistics Department of HKSAR Government (2019). Report on Manpower Projection to 2027. Census and Statistics Department, The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. https://www.censtatd.gov.hk/en/EIndexbySubject.html?scode=220&pcode=B1050016

  67. The Census and Statistics Department of HKSAR Government (2022). 2021 Population Census, Main Results. www.censtatd.gov.hk. https://www.censtatd.gov.hk/en/data/stat_report/product/B1120109/att/B11201092021XXXXB0100.pdf

  68. The Census and Statistics Department of HKSAR Government. (2022). Demographic Trends in Hong Kong 1991–2021. Census and Statistics Department, The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. https://www.censtatd.gov.hk/en/data/stat_report/product/B1120017/att/B1120017052022XXXXB0100.pdf

  69. The Hong Kong Federation of Youth Groups (2016). Housing Aspirations of Youth in Hong Kong. hkfyg.org.hk. https://yrc.hkfyg.org.hk/2016/11/15/%e9%a6%99%e6%b8%af%e9%9d%92%e5%b9%b4%e5%b0%8d%e4%bd%8f%e5%b1%8b%e7%9a%84%e6%9c%9f%e6%9c%9b/ 

  70. The Hong Kong Federation of Youth Groups (2021). Tackling Hong Kong’s Brain Drain. hkfyg.org.hk. https://yrc.hkfyg.org.hk/en/2021/03/15/tackling-hong-kongs-brain-drain/

  71. The University of Hong Kong Social Science Research Centre & Youth Development Commission (2014). Trend analyses of data in the Hong Kong Youth Statistics Profile (香港青年統計資料概覽數據趨勢分析). Youth Development Commission. https://www.ydc.gov.hk/files/pressroom/youth_in_hk_trend_analysis_of_statistics.pdf

  72. Vliet W.V. (1998) The Encyclopedia of Housing. SAGE Publication, California.

  73. Wang, D., & Li, S. M. (2004). Housing preferences in a transitional housing system: the case of Bejing, China. Environment and Planning A, 36(1), 69-87.

  74. Waters, J. L., & Leung, M. W. (2024). Cross-Border Mobility for Schooling: The Case of Shenzhen-Hong Kong. Handbook of Children and Youth Studies, 1227-1242.

  75. Waters, J., & Leung, M. (2021). Geographies of education: Cross-border schooling between Shenzhen and Hong Kong. Geography, 106(2), 60-65.

  76. Wedley, W. (2017). SAATY 1977: The building blocks. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 9(3).

  77. Wolday, F., & Böcker, L. (2023). Exploring changes in residential preference during COVID-19: Implications to contemporary urban planning. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 50(5), 1280-1297.

  78. Wu, F. (2010). Housing environment preference of young consumers in Guangzhou, China: Using the analytic hierarchy process. Property Management, 28(3), 174-192.

  79. Wu, W., & Ge, X. J. (2020). Communal space design of high-rise apartments: A literature review. Journal of Design and Built Environment, 20(1), 35-49.

  80. Wu, Z. G. (1997). Dictionary of Population Science (人口科学辞典). Southwestern University of Finance and Economics Press (西南财经大学出版社).

  81. Ye, R., De Vos, J., & Ma, L. (2020). Analysing the association of dissonance between actual and ideal commute time and commute satisfaction. Transportation research part A: policy and practice, 132, 47-60.

  82. Yim C. H. & Lau K. Y. (2024, February 21). Reflecting on the housing problem of Hong Kong young people from the Guangdong Youth Housing Scheme (從粵青年安居計劃反思港青住屋問題). https://paper.hket.com/article/3709266/%E5%BE%9E%E7%B2%B5%E9%9D%92%E5%B9%B4%E5%AE%89%E5%B1%85%E8%A8%88%E5%8A%83%20%E5%8F%8D%E6%80%9D%E6%B8%AF%E9%9D%92%E4%BD%8F%E5%B1%8B%E5%95%8F%E9%A1%8C

  83. Yuen, C. Y., & Cheung, A. C. (2014). School engagement and parental involvement: The case of cross-border students in Singapore. The Australian educational researcher, 41, 89-107.