Urbanie & Urbanus

Issue 2026 Aug

Empathetic and Inclusive Design

https://www.doi.org/10.55412/14.04

Issue 14, P. - P.

From “I Feel” to “Users Need” AI-Simulated Experience and the Construction of User Knowledge in Inclusive Architectural Design

Mohamed Ahmed Mohamed Abdellatif Khalil

School of Design, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

 and  Dr. Hee Sun (Sunny) Choi

BA MA PhD, Adjunct Assistant Professor,
MDes (Urban Environments Design), School of Design,
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University,
Director at Choi-Comer Asia Architecture and Urban Design
View Article

References

  1. Agnew, W., Bergman, A.S., Chien, J., Díaz, M., El-Sayed, S., Pittman, J., Mohamed, S. & McKee, K.R., 2024. The illusion of artificial inclusion. Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642703.
  2. Amin, D., Salminen, J., Jansen, B.J., Shin, J. & Kim, D.H., 2025. Generative AI personas considered harmful? Putting forth twenty challenges of algorithmic user representation in human-computer interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 205, 103657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2025.103657.
  3. Annand, P.J., Garasto, S. & Groves, L., 2026. Public say versus public sway: ‘Lived experience literacy’ in the pursuit of participatory AI. Big Data & Society, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517261447845.
  4. Bianchin, M. & Heylighen, A., 2018. Just design. Design Studies, 54, pp. 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.10.001.
  5. Blyth, A. & Worthington, J., 2010. Managing the Brief for Better Design. 2nd ed. Abingdon: Routledge.
  6. Chen, Z., Zhu, D. & Zheng, L.N., 2026. When synthetic users fail: A cross-domain benchmark of LLM-simulated human survey responses. arXiv:2607.26348 [preprint; under peer review].
  7. Conklin, J. & Begeman, M.L., 1988. gIBIS: A hypertext tool for exploratory policy discussion. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 6(4), pp. 303-331. https://doi.org/10.1145/62266.62278.
  8. Elisha-Wigwe, O., Brubaker, E.R. & Schauer, A., 2026. Simulated stakeholders: Using critical frameworks to examine LLM agents in early-stage design. Journal of Mechanical Design, advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4072422.
  9. Fricker, M., 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001.
  10. Goel, D., Goyal, A., Duddu, V., Pal, O., Rodriguez, V.J., Brown, D.S., Karkar, R., Yoo, D.W. & Saha, K., 2026. When AI says “I have been in similar situations”: Synthetic lived experience in peer-like caregiver support. arXiv:2606.18057v2 [preprint].
  11. Gu, E.H., Chandrasegaran, S. & Lloyd, P., 2025. Synthetic users: Insights from designers’ interactions with persona-based chatbots. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 39, e2, pp. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060424000283.
  12. Haxvig, H.A., D’Andrea, V. & Teli, M., 2025. “I’ve never seen a glass ceiling better represented”: Bias and gendering in LLM-generated synthetic personas from a participatory design perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 205, 103651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2025.103651.
  13. He, J. & Yang, C., 2025. Testimony by LLMs. AI & Society, 40, pp. 6201-6213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02366-y.
  14. Heylighen, A. & Bianchin, M., 2018. Building justice: How to overcome the inclusive design paradox? Built Environment, 44(1), pp. 23-35. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.44.1.23.
  15. Jauhiainen, J.S., Hakanpää, S., Honkasaari, H.-P., Kivilompolo, N., Kurri, M., Lehtiranta, L. & Nurminen, M., 2026. Generative AI in participatory urban planning: Synthetic inhabitants and experts. Land, 15(3), 407. https://doi.org/10.3390/land15030407.
  16. Kim, T., Hong, M.K., Chen, Y.-Y., Li, J.Q., Van, M.P., Hakimi, S., Kay, M. & Klenk, M., 2026. Personagram: Bridging personas and product design for creative ideation with multimodal LLMs. arXiv:2602.06197 [preprint]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.06197.
  17. Ozkaya, I. & Akin, Ö., 2007. Tool support for computer-aided requirement traceability in architectural design: The case of DesignTrack. Automation in Construction, 16(5), pp. 674-684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2006.11.006.
  18. Salminen, J., Jung, S.G., Kaate, I., Xuan, T.T.T., Azem, J.Y., Aldous, K.K., Amin, D. & Jansen, B.J., 2026. AI representing personas representing user groups: Applying the agency theory to examine interaction challenges of conversational personas as decision-making tools. Decision Support Systems, 205, 114633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2026.114633.
  19. Seyman Güray, T. & Uyan, B., 2025. Collaboration with generative artificial intelligence in the early stages of design studio: A model proposal. Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications, 10(1), pp. 434-450. https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1649820.
  20. Truss, M., 2026. PersonaCite: VoC-grounded interviewable agentic synthetic AI personas for verifiable user and design research. Extended Abstracts of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3772363.3798543.
  21. Tvedebrink, T.D.O. & Jelić, A., 2018. Getting under the(ir) skin: Applying personas and scenarios with body-environment research for improved understanding of users’ perspective in architectural design. Persona Studies, 4(2), pp. 5-24.
  22. Van der Linden, V., Dong, H. & Heylighen, A., 2019a. Tracing architects’ fragile knowing about users in the socio-material environment of design practice. Design Studies, 63, pp. 65-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.02.004.
  23. Van der Linden, V., Dong, H. & Heylighen, A., 2019b. Populating architectural design: Introducing scenario-based design in residential care projects. International Journal of Design, 13(1), pp. 21-36.
  24. Verhulst, L., Elsen, C. & Heylighen, A., 2016. Whom do architects have in mind during design when users are absent? Observations from a design competition. Journal of Design Research, 14(4), pp. 368-387. https://doi.org/10.1504/JDR.2016.082032.
  25. Wang, Z., Dai, Y., Lyu, D., Nader, M., Chen, S., Ye, W., Ding, Z. & Yan, X., 2026. StreetDesignAI: Broadening designer perspectives through multi-persona evaluation of cycling infrastructure. Proceedings of the 2026 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference, pp. 483-503. https://doi.org/10.1145/3800645.3812888.
  26. Wu, Y., Cao, S. & Ji, G., 2026. Natural language-driven architectural space cognition: An AI-agent-based intelligent recommendation system for residential floor plans. Proceedings of the 31st International Conference of the Association for Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA), 1, pp. 93-102.
  27. Zahedi, A., Abualdenien, J., Petzold, F. & Borrmann, A., 2022. BIM-based design decisions documentation using design episodes, explanation tags, and constraints. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 27, pp. 756-780. https://doi.org/10.36680/j.itcon.2022.037.
  Previous Article
Next Article