Urbanie & Urbanus

Issue 2020 Nov

The Liveable City

Issue 4, P.33 - P.50

TOD, volumetric TOD, Destination, Public Space and Community Cohesion

Shanshan Meng

Urban Planner, China Academy of Urban Planning & Design, Shenzhen

and  Rifat Ara Mostafa

Research Assistant, DUPAD, The University of Hong Kong 

and  Songyang Zhang

Research Assistant, DUPAD, The University of Hong Kong

and  Alain Chiaradia

Associate Professor, Master of Urban Design, The University of Hong Kong

References

  1. Berger-Schmitt, R., 2000. Social cohesion as an aspect of the quality of societies: Concept and measurement, Manheim: Centre for Survey Research and Methodology (ZUMA), Social Indicators Department.

  2. Bruhn, J., 2009. The concept of social cohesion. In: The group effect. Boston, MA: Springer, pp. 31-48.

  3. Cerin, E. et al., 2013. Socioeconomic status, neighborhood characteristics, and walking within the neighborhood among older Hong Kong Chinese. Journal of aging and health, 25(8), pp. 1425-1444.

  4. Cervero, R. & Kockelman, K., 1997. Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2(3), pp. 199-219.

  5. Cervero, R. & Murakami, J., 2009. Rail and Property Development in Hong Kong: Experiences and Extensions. Urban Studies, 46(10), p. 2019–2043.

  6. Chan, E., 2014. Are informal connections a functional alternative to associational life in enhancing social cohesion? Findings from Hong Kong. Social indicators research, 119(2), pp. 803-821.

  7. Cooper, C., Fone, D. & Chiaradia, A., 2014. Measuring the impact of spatial network layout on community social cohesion: a cross-sectional study. International Journal of Health Geographics, 13(1), p.11.

  8. Dempsey, N., 2008. Does quality of the built environment affect social cohesion?. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Urban Design and Planning, 161(3), pp. 105-114.

  9. Dragolov, G. et al., 2013. Social Cohesion Radar Measuring Common Ground: An international Comparison of Social Cohesion Methods Report, Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.

  10. Ewing, R. & Cervero, R., 2010. Travel and the Built Environment. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76(3), pp. 265-294.

  11. Gehl, J., 2011. Life between building : using public space. Washington D.C.: Island Press.

  12. He, S., Tao, S., Hou, Y. & Jiang, W., 2018. Mass Transit Railway, transit-oriented development and spatial justice: the competition for prime residential locations in Hong Kong since the 1980s. Town Planning Review, 85(5), pp. 467-493.

  13. Ibraeva, A., de Almeida Correia, G. C. & Antunes, A., 2020. Transit-oriented development: A review of research achievements and challenges. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Volume 132, pp. 110-130.

  14. Liu, Y., Wu, F., Liu, Y. & Li, Z., 2017. Changing neighbourhood cohesion under the impact of urban redevelopment: A case study of Guangzhou, China. Urban Geography, 38(2), pp. 266-290.

  15. Maas, J., Van Dillen, S., Verheij, R. & Groenewegen, P., 2009. Social contacts as a possible mechanism behind the relation between green space and
    health. Health & place, 15(2), pp. 586-595.

  16. Mazumdar, S., Learnihan, V., Cochrane, T. & Davey, R., 2018. The built environment and social capital: A systematic review. Environment and Behavior, 50(2), pp. 119-158.

  17. Padeiro, M., Louro, A. & da Costa, N., 2019. Transit-oriented development and gentrification: a systematic review. Transport Reviews, 39(6), pp.733-754.

  18. Rogers, S., Gardner, K. & Carlson, C., 2013. Social capital and walkability as social aspects of sustainability. Sustainability, 5(8), pp. 3473-3483.

  19. Schiefer, D. & van der Noll, J., 2017. The essentials of social cohesion: A literature review. Social Indicators Research, 132(2), pp. 579-603.

  20. Stiftung, B., ed., 2017. What Holds Asian Societies Together? Insights from the Social Cohesion Radar. Gütersloh: Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung.

  21. Wood, L., Frank, L. & Giles-Corti, B., 2010. Sense of community and its relationship with walking and neighborhood design. Social science & medicine, 70(9), pp. 1381-1390