Urbanie & Urbanus

Issue 2022 Dec

Resilient cities

https://www.doi.org/10.55412/07.04

Issue 7, P.55 - P.89

Accessibility to Hong Kong urban waterfront Is it fostering resilient communities?

Tuendoekova Reka

University of Hong Kong, FoA, DUPAD

 and  Jin Zhang

University of Hong Kong, FoA, DUPAD

 and  Vera Kleesattel

University of Hong Kong, FoA, DUPAD

 and  Alain Chiaradia

Associate Professor, Master of Urban Design, The University of Hong Kong
View Article

References

  1. ARUP, 2014. Travel Characteristics Survey 2011 - Final report, Hong Kong: Transport Department .
  2. Bohannon, R. W. & Andrews, A. W., 2011. Normal walking speed: a descriptive meta-analysis. Physiotherapy, 97(3), pp. 182-189..
  3. Breen, A. & Rigby, D., 1996. The New Waterfront, A worldwide Urban Success Story. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  4. Byrne, J., 2012. When green is White: The cultural politics of race, nature and social exclusion in a Los Angeles urban national park. ,. Geoforum, 43(3), pp. 595-611..
  5. Chandra, A. et al., 2011. Building community resilience to disasters: A way forward to enhance national health security, Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
  6. Cheung, D. M. W. & Tang, B. S., 2015. Social order, leisure, or tourist attraction? The changing planning missions for waterfront space in Hong Kong. Habitat International, Volume 47, pp. 231-240.
  7. Coaffee, J., 2013. Rescaling and responsibilising the politics of urban resilience: From national security to local place-making. Politics, 33(4), pp. 240-252.
  8. Coaffee, J., 2013. Towards next-generation urban resilience in planning practice: From securitization to integrated place making. Planning Practice & Research, 28(3), pp. .323-339. 
  9. Colomb, C., 2015. Culture and Urban Development: Revisiting the Legacy of Harvey's Condition of Postmodernity on Urban Studies, 25 Years On. Built Environment, 41(3), pp. 366-378.
  10. Cooper, C., Harvey, I., Orford, S. & Chiaradia A, J., 2019. Using multiple hybrid spatial design network analysis to predict longitudinal effect of a major city centre redevelopment on pedestrian flows. Transportation.
  11. Cooper, C. H. V. & Chiaradia, A. J. F., 2020. sDNA: 3d Spatial Design Network Analysis for GIS, CAD, Command Line & Python. SoftwareX, pp. 1-24. 
  12. Coutts, C., Horner, M. & Chapin, T., 2010. Using geographical information system to model the effects of green space accessibility on mortality in Florida. ,. Geocarto International, 25(6), pp. 471-484.
  13. Fan, Z. et al., 2021. How Did Built Environment Affect Urban Vitality in Urban Waterfronts? A Case Study in Nanjing Reach of Yangtze River. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 10(9), p. 611.
  14. Flyvbjerg, B., 2013. Five Misunderstandings about Case Study Research, Corrected. In: B. Savin & C. Major, eds. Qualitative Research: The Essential Guide to Theory and Practice. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 165-166.
  15. Francis, M., 2001. A case study method for landscape architecture. Landscape journal, 20(1), pp. 15-29.
  16. Garrett, J. K. et al., 2019. Urban blue space and health and wellbeing in Hong Kong: Results from a survey of older adults. Health & Place, Volume 55, pp. 100-110.
  17. Giovinazzi, O. & Giovinazzi, S., 2008. Waterfront planning: a window of opportunities for post-disaster reconstruction. Canterbury, University of Canterbury. Civil and Natural Resources Engineering. 
  18. Hillier, B. & Iida, S., 2005. Network effects and psychological effects: a theory of urban movement. In: G. Cohn A & M. Mark D, eds. Spatial Information Theory. COSIT 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3693. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 475-490.
  19. Hillier, B. et al., 1993. Natural movement: or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Volume 20, pp. 29-66.
  20. HKSAR LandsD, 2022. 3D Pedestrian Network, Hong Kong: HKSAR.
  21. Jacobs, J., 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.
  22. Kunzmann, K. R., 1998. Planning for spatial equity in Europe. International planning studies, 3(1), pp. 101-120..
  23. Lai, C., 2018. Open space opinion survey, Hong Kong: Civic Exchange.
  24. Lai, C. & Da Roza, A., 2018. Managing Vibrant Streets, Hong Kong: Civic Exchnage. 
  25. Lang, W. C. T. C. E. Y. E. a. L. T. 2., 2019. Understanding livable dense urban form for shaping the landscape of community facilities in Hong Kong using fine-scale measurements. Cities, Volume 84, pp. 34-45.
  26. Leporelli, E. & Santi, G., 2019. From psychology of sustainability to sustainability of urban spaces: Promoting a primary prevention approach for well-being in the healthy city designing. A waterfront case study in Livorno. Sustainability, 11(3), p. 760.
  27. Leyden, K. M., 2003. Social capital and the built environment: the importance of walkable neighborhoods. American journal of public health, 93(9), pp. 1546-1551.
  28. Ling, X., 2015, November. Defining Accessibility of Open Space in Relation to Urban configuration: Case Study of Wanchai, Hong Kong. Niagara Falls, Canada, pp. 187-201. 5th International Conference on Civil Engineering and Transportation. Atlantis Press.
  29. Liu, S., Lai, S. Q., Liu, C. & Jiang, L., 2021. What influenced the vitality of the waterfront open space? A case study of Huangpu River in Shanghai, China. Cities, Volume 114, p. 103197.
  30. Lynch, K., 1981. Good City Form. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  31. Macdonald, E., 2018. Urban Waterfront Promenades. New York, NY: Routledge.
  32. Montgomery, J., 1998. Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design. Journal of urban design, 3(1), pp. 93-116.
  33. Murotani, B., ed., 1984. Waterfront. Tokyo: Process: Architecture.
  34. Paquet, C. et al., 2013. Are accessibility and characteristics of public open spaces associated with a better cardiometabolic health?. Landscape and urban planning, Volume 118, pp. 70-78.
  35. Putnam, R. D., 2011. Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. In: J. Lin & C. Mele, eds. The Urban Sociology Reader. Oxon: ROutledge, pp. 68-76.
  36. Ruddin, L., 2006. You can generalize stupid! Social scientists, Bent Flyvbjerg, and case study methodology. Qualitative inquiry, 12(4), pp. 797-812.
  37. Sairinen, R. & Kumpulainen, S., 2006. Assessing social impacts in urban waterfront regeneration. Environmental impact assessment review, 26(1), pp. 120-135.
  38. Sevtsuk, A. & Kalvo, R., 2015. Urban Network Analysis Toolbox for Rhinoceros 3D, Harvard, MA: City Form Lab, MIT. 
  39. Sharifi, A., 2016. A critical review of selected tools for assessing community resilience. Ecological indicators, Volume 69, pp. 629-647.
  40. Shelton, B., Karakiewicz, J. & Kvan, T., 2011. The Making of Hong Kong: From Vertical to Volumetric. London: Routledge.
  41. Sung, H. & Lee, S., 2015. Residential built environment and walking activity: Empirical evidence of Jane Jacobs’ urban vitality. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Volume 41, pp. 318-329.
  42. Venerandi, A., Quattrone, G. & Capra, L., 2016. City form and well-being: what makes London neighborhoods good places to live?. In (pp. Burlingame, CA, Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGSPATIAL international conference on advances in GIS.
  43. Wang, H., Kwan, M. P. & Hu, M., 2020. Social exclusion and accessibility among low-and non-low-income groups: A case study of Nanjing, China. Cities, Volume 101, p. 102684..
  44. Weibull, J. W., 1980. On the numerical measurement of accessibility. Environment and Planning A, 12(1), pp. 53-67.
  45. Wu, J., Chen, X. & Chen, S., 2019. Temporal characteristics of waterfronts in Wuhan city and people’s behavioral preferences based on social media data. Sustainability, 11(22), p. 6308.
  46. Xia, C., Zhang, A. & Yeh, A. G., 2022. The varying relationships between multidimensional urban form and urban vitality in Chinese megacities: Insights from a comparative analysis. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 112(1), pp. 141-166.
  47. Ye, Y., Li, D. & Liu, X., 2018. How block density and typology affect urban vitality: An exploratory analysis in Shenzhen, China. Urban Geography, 39(4), pp. 631-652.
  48. Yu, A., 2021. 2021. Open space and sense of community of older adults: A study in a residential area in Hong Kong.. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research., 15(3), pp. 287-302.
  49. Zhang, L. & Chiaradia, A. J. F., 2022. Walking in the cities without ground, how 3D complex network volumetrics improve analysis. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science. 
  50. Zhou, X. & Rana, M. P., 2012. Social benefits of urban green space: A conceptual framework of valuation and accessibility measurements. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 23(2), pp. 173-189.
  Previous Article
Next Article